Review



s1pr4 antagonist cym50358  (Tocris)


Bioz Verified Symbol Tocris is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Tocris manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Tocris s1pr4 antagonist cym50358
    Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and <t>S1PR4</t> in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant
    S1pr4 Antagonist Cym50358, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/s1pr4 antagonist cym50358/product/Tocris
    Average 93 stars, based on 8 article reviews
    s1pr4 antagonist cym50358 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Spinster homolog 2/S1P signaling ameliorates macrophage inflammatory response to bacterial infections by balancing PGE 2 production"

    Article Title: Spinster homolog 2/S1P signaling ameliorates macrophage inflammatory response to bacterial infections by balancing PGE 2 production

    Journal: Cell Communication and Signaling : CCS

    doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01851-z

    Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant
    Figure Legend Snippet: Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant

    Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Inhibition, Expressing, Blocking Assay, Fluorescence



    Similar Products

    93
    Tocris s1pr4 antagonist cym50358
    Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and <t>S1PR4</t> in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant
    S1pr4 Antagonist Cym50358, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/s1pr4 antagonist cym50358/product/Tocris
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    s1pr4 antagonist cym50358 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Hycultec Inc s1pr4-specific antagonist cym50358
    Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and <t>S1PR4</t> in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant
    S1pr4 Specific Antagonist Cym50358, supplied by Hycultec Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/s1pr4-specific antagonist cym50358/product/Hycultec Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    s1pr4-specific antagonist cym50358 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Tocris s1pr4 antagonist
    Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and <t>S1PR4</t> in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant
    S1pr4 Antagonist, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/s1pr4 antagonist/product/Tocris
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    s1pr4 antagonist - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tocris s1pr4 antagonist cym 50358
    <t>S1PR4-KO</t> and WT mice were crossed into the polyoma middle T oncogene (PyMT) background. (A) Tumor burden at the endpoint (after 1 tumor reached a diameter of approximately 1.5 cm). (B) Kaplan-Meier curve showing survival of WT (n = 26) and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice (n = 34) until the endpoint. (C) Representative sections of lung lobes stained with Mayer’s hemalum. Arrows indicate metastases. Scale bars: 1 mm. (D) Number of metastatic lung nodules in WT (n = 11) and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice (n = 15) at the endpoint. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
    S1pr4 Antagonist Cym 50358, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/s1pr4 antagonist cym 50358/product/Tocris
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    s1pr4 antagonist cym 50358 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tocris s1pr1, s1pr3, s1pr4 antagonist (vpc20391
    Brain water content at 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the <t>S1PR1</t> agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. & P<0.05 versus fingolimod. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.
    S1pr1, S1pr3, S1pr4 Antagonist (Vpc20391, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/s1pr1, s1pr3, s1pr4 antagonist (vpc20391/product/Tocris
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    s1pr1, s1pr3, s1pr4 antagonist (vpc20391 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    R&D Systems s1pr4 antagonist (cym 50358
    Brain water content at 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the <t>S1PR1</t> agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. & P<0.05 versus fingolimod. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.
    S1pr4 Antagonist (Cym 50358, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/s1pr4 antagonist (cym 50358/product/R&D Systems
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    s1pr4 antagonist (cym 50358 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Daiichi Sankyo an antagonist or an interfering rna of s1pr1, s1pr2, s1pr3 or s1pr4 for preventing and/or treating calcified aortic stenosis
    Brain water content at 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the <t>S1PR1</t> agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. & P<0.05 versus fingolimod. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.
    An Antagonist Or An Interfering Rna Of S1pr1, S1pr2, S1pr3 Or S1pr4 For Preventing And/Or Treating Calcified Aortic Stenosis, supplied by Daiichi Sankyo, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/an antagonist or an interfering rna of s1pr1, s1pr2, s1pr3 or s1pr4 for preventing and/or treating calcified aortic stenosis/product/Daiichi Sankyo
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    an antagonist or an interfering rna of s1pr1, s1pr2, s1pr3 or s1pr4 for preventing and/or treating calcified aortic stenosis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant

    Journal: Cell Communication and Signaling : CCS

    Article Title: Spinster homolog 2/S1P signaling ameliorates macrophage inflammatory response to bacterial infections by balancing PGE 2 production

    doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01851-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Spns2/S1P signaling impacts mitochondrial functions through coordinated activation of multiple S1P receptors (A) All five S1PRs are transcriptionally detectable in PMs. N = 3 biological replicates. (B) Inhibition of individual S1PRs in WT PMs increases the gene expression of Ptges , while activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 in Spns2 −/− PMs may slightly reduce Ptges expression. N = 4 biological replicates. (C) In WT PMs, blocking individual S1PRs reduces the fluorescence intensity of MitoTracker™ Red, indicating diminished ΔΨm. (D) S1PR3 blockade significantly increases the fluorescence intensity of CytoFix™ MitoRed, indicating increased mitochondrial mass, while blockade of other receptors may cause a slight increase in mitochondrial mass. (E) All treatments result in reduced average Δψm (calculated by the ratio of MT/CF) in WT PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( C to E ). ( F , G ) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR3 and S1PR5 increases MitoTracker™ Red fluorescence intensity (F) , but none of the treatments affect mitochondrial mass (G) . (H) Only S1PR3 activation partially restores the average Δψm in Spns2 −/− PMs. N = 3 biological replicates ( F to H ). (I) All the antagonists increase mtROS generation in WT PMs, especially with S1PR2 and S1PR4 blockade. N = 3 biological replicates. (J) In Spns2 −/− PMs, activation of S1PR2 and S1PR4 attenuates oxidative stress. N = 3 biological replicates. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. P values were determined by unpaired t -test (A) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction for multiple comparisons ( B to J ). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s., not significant

    Article Snippet: PMs were pre-treated with the following compounds for 1-h before analysis, unless otherwise stated: 5 µM Spns2 inhibitor SLF1081851 (MedChemExpress, HY-149004), 1 µM S1P, 100 nM PF-04418948, 100 nM ONO-AE3-208, 200 nM PGE 2 (TargetMOI, T5014), 2 µM S1PR1 antagonist W146 (Cayman Chemical, 10009109), 2 µM S1PR2 antagonist JTE013 (Cayman Chemical, 10009458), 2 µM S1PR3 antagonist TY-52,156 (TargetMOI, T17183), 2 µM S1PR4 antagonist CYM50358 (Tocris Bioscience, 4679), 5 µM S1PR1 agonist CYM5442 (TargetMOI, T2026), 5 µM S1PR2 agonist CYM5520 (TargetMOI, T22703), 5 µM S1PR3 agonist CYM5541 (TargetMOI, T3961), 5 µM S1PR4 agonist CYM50260 (TargetMOI, T15031), and 50 nM S1PR5 agonist A971432 (Cayman Chemical, 25326).

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Inhibition, Expressing, Blocking Assay, Fluorescence

    S1PR4-KO and WT mice were crossed into the polyoma middle T oncogene (PyMT) background. (A) Tumor burden at the endpoint (after 1 tumor reached a diameter of approximately 1.5 cm). (B) Kaplan-Meier curve showing survival of WT (n = 26) and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice (n = 34) until the endpoint. (C) Representative sections of lung lobes stained with Mayer’s hemalum. Arrows indicate metastases. Scale bars: 1 mm. (D) Number of metastatic lung nodules in WT (n = 11) and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice (n = 15) at the endpoint. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: S1PR4-KO and WT mice were crossed into the polyoma middle T oncogene (PyMT) background. (A) Tumor burden at the endpoint (after 1 tumor reached a diameter of approximately 1.5 cm). (B) Kaplan-Meier curve showing survival of WT (n = 26) and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice (n = 34) until the endpoint. (C) Representative sections of lung lobes stained with Mayer’s hemalum. Arrows indicate metastases. Scale bars: 1 mm. (D) Number of metastatic lung nodules in WT (n = 11) and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice (n = 15) at the endpoint. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: Staining

    (A) Representative t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots show differences in immune cell infiltrates at the endpoint. (B–D) Relative amounts of immune cell populations (B), FoxP3+ Tregs (C), and CD8+ T cells (D) in PyMT tumors of WT (n = 17) and KO (n = 18) mice analyzed by FACS. (E and F) Sections from PyMT tumors were stained for CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. (E) Quantification of CD8+ T cells as a percentage of total cells (WT: n = 10, KO: n = 9) and (F) representative sections stained for CD8 (brown) and DAPI (blue; nuclei). Scale bars: 200 μm; magnified areas: 50 μm. (G) Relative numbers of Trm (CD103+), exhausted (PD-1+), and effector CD8+ T cells (CD49a–CD103–) in tumors (n = 10) determined by FACS. (H) Relative numbers of gMDSCs (CD11b+Ly6GhiLy6Clo) and mMDSCs (CD11b+Ly6GloLy6Chi) in PyMT tumors (WT, n = 5; KO, n = 6) expressing arginase 1 (Arg1) determined by FACS. (I) Relative numbers of proliferating T cells upon coculture with WT (n = 18) and S1PR4-KO (n = 10) MDSCs in different ratios determined by FACS. (J) Chemokine levels in WT (n = 15) and S1PR4-KO PyMT (n = 14) tumors determined by LEGENDplex. (K) Splenocytes of WT mice in the upper well of a modified Boyden chamber were allowed to migrate toward extracellular fluid from WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT tumors (n = 10). Migrated cell populations were analyzed by FACS. Heat-inactivated FCS served as control. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test (D, E, G, and J), 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (K); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plots show differences in immune cell infiltrates at the endpoint. (B–D) Relative amounts of immune cell populations (B), FoxP3+ Tregs (C), and CD8+ T cells (D) in PyMT tumors of WT (n = 17) and KO (n = 18) mice analyzed by FACS. (E and F) Sections from PyMT tumors were stained for CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. (E) Quantification of CD8+ T cells as a percentage of total cells (WT: n = 10, KO: n = 9) and (F) representative sections stained for CD8 (brown) and DAPI (blue; nuclei). Scale bars: 200 μm; magnified areas: 50 μm. (G) Relative numbers of Trm (CD103+), exhausted (PD-1+), and effector CD8+ T cells (CD49a–CD103–) in tumors (n = 10) determined by FACS. (H) Relative numbers of gMDSCs (CD11b+Ly6GhiLy6Clo) and mMDSCs (CD11b+Ly6GloLy6Chi) in PyMT tumors (WT, n = 5; KO, n = 6) expressing arginase 1 (Arg1) determined by FACS. (I) Relative numbers of proliferating T cells upon coculture with WT (n = 18) and S1PR4-KO (n = 10) MDSCs in different ratios determined by FACS. (J) Chemokine levels in WT (n = 15) and S1PR4-KO PyMT (n = 14) tumors determined by LEGENDplex. (K) Splenocytes of WT mice in the upper well of a modified Boyden chamber were allowed to migrate toward extracellular fluid from WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT tumors (n = 10). Migrated cell populations were analyzed by FACS. Heat-inactivated FCS served as control. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test (D, E, G, and J), 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (K); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Modification

    (A) Experimental outline of the AOM/DSS model applied to WT and S1PR4-KO mice. (B) Weight of AOM/DSS-treated WT and S1PR4-KO mice as a percentage of weight at the initiation of treatment (n = 9). (C and D) Relative amounts of CD45+ leukocytes (C) and immune cell populations (D) in the LP of WT and S1PR4-KO mice at day 0 (n = 6), day 8 (n = 8), day 15 (n = 4), and day 84 (n = 9) analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Representative pictures of WT and S1PR4-KO AOM/DSS-treated colon tissue at day 8 stained with H&E. Scale bars: 1 mm; scale bars of magnified areas:100 μm. (F) Colon weight-to-length ratio determined for WT and KO AOM/DSS-treated mice at days 0 (WT: n = 7, KO: n = 8), 8 (n = 4), 15 (n = 5), and 84 (n = 10). Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Experimental outline of the AOM/DSS model applied to WT and S1PR4-KO mice. (B) Weight of AOM/DSS-treated WT and S1PR4-KO mice as a percentage of weight at the initiation of treatment (n = 9). (C and D) Relative amounts of CD45+ leukocytes (C) and immune cell populations (D) in the LP of WT and S1PR4-KO mice at day 0 (n = 6), day 8 (n = 8), day 15 (n = 4), and day 84 (n = 9) analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Representative pictures of WT and S1PR4-KO AOM/DSS-treated colon tissue at day 8 stained with H&E. Scale bars: 1 mm; scale bars of magnified areas:100 μm. (F) Colon weight-to-length ratio determined for WT and KO AOM/DSS-treated mice at days 0 (WT: n = 7, KO: n = 8), 8 (n = 4), 15 (n = 5), and 84 (n = 10). Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Staining

    (A) Representative images of WT and S1PR4-KO AOM/DSS-treated colons at day 84 stained with H&E. Scale bars: 1 mm. (B) Number of tumors per mouse for WT and S1PR4-KO mice (n = 9) at day 84 after treatment with AOM/DSS. (C) Representative tSNE plots showing the composition of the epithelial layer from WT and S1PR4-KO colons at day 84. (D and E) Relative amounts of CD8+ IEL (D) and CD8+ Trm IELs (E) within the epithelial layer of WT and S1PR4-KO mice at day 0 (n = 6), day 8 (n = 8), day 15 (n = 4), and day 84 (n = 9) analyzed by flow cytometry. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative images of WT and S1PR4-KO AOM/DSS-treated colons at day 84 stained with H&E. Scale bars: 1 mm. (B) Number of tumors per mouse for WT and S1PR4-KO mice (n = 9) at day 84 after treatment with AOM/DSS. (C) Representative tSNE plots showing the composition of the epithelial layer from WT and S1PR4-KO colons at day 84. (D and E) Relative amounts of CD8+ IEL (D) and CD8+ Trm IELs (E) within the epithelial layer of WT and S1PR4-KO mice at day 0 (n = 6), day 8 (n = 8), day 15 (n = 4), and day 84 (n = 9) analyzed by flow cytometry. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: Staining, Flow Cytometry

    (A) WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice were treated with 5 mg/kg DXR once a week without (B–E) or with CD8-depleting antibodies (F and G). (B) Tumor size kinetics in DXR-treated PyMT mice (n = 10). (C) Relative numbers of lymphocyte subsets in PyMT tumors of WT (n = 10) and S1PR4-KO (n = 9) mice after 5 weeks of DXR treatment. (D) Representative FACS plots showing percentage of CD8+ T cells in PyMT tumors. (E) Relative numbers of Trm (CD103+), exhausted (PD-1+), and effector CD8+ T cells (CD49a–CD103–) in DXR-treated WT (n = 11) and KO (n = 12) PyMT tumors determined by FACS. (F) Tumor size kinetics in DXR and anti-CD8 antibody (n = 6) or IgG control antibody (WT, n = 11; S1PR4-KO, n = 8) treated PyMT mice. (G) Representative FACS plots showing percentage of CD8+ and CD8/4 DN T cells in IgG- or anti–CD8-treated WT PyMT tumors. Means ± SEM; 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (B, C, and F), 2-tailed Student’s t test (E); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice were treated with 5 mg/kg DXR once a week without (B–E) or with CD8-depleting antibodies (F and G). (B) Tumor size kinetics in DXR-treated PyMT mice (n = 10). (C) Relative numbers of lymphocyte subsets in PyMT tumors of WT (n = 10) and S1PR4-KO (n = 9) mice after 5 weeks of DXR treatment. (D) Representative FACS plots showing percentage of CD8+ T cells in PyMT tumors. (E) Relative numbers of Trm (CD103+), exhausted (PD-1+), and effector CD8+ T cells (CD49a–CD103–) in DXR-treated WT (n = 11) and KO (n = 12) PyMT tumors determined by FACS. (F) Tumor size kinetics in DXR and anti-CD8 antibody (n = 6) or IgG control antibody (WT, n = 11; S1PR4-KO, n = 8) treated PyMT mice. (G) Representative FACS plots showing percentage of CD8+ and CD8/4 DN T cells in IgG- or anti–CD8-treated WT PyMT tumors. Means ± SEM; 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (B, C, and F), 2-tailed Student’s t test (E); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques:

    (A–D) WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice were treated with either anti–PD-1 or IgG isotype control antibodies (n = 17 each) on days 0, 6, 12, and 18 after the first tumor reached 0.6 cm in diameter. Tumors were harvested at day 27. (A) Experimental outline. (B) Relative numbers of CD8+PD-1+ and total CD8+ T cells infiltrated into PyMT tumors (n = 17) 4 weeks after treatment began. (C and D) Tumor size kinetics of treated WT (C) and S1PR4-KO (n = 16) PyMT mice (D). (E) Ifna and Ifnb mRNA expression in WT (n = 8) and S1PR4-KO (n = 9) PyMT tumors determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR). (F) Relative numbers of exhausted CD8+PD-1+ T cells in PyMT tumors of IFNAR1 WT S1PR4 WT (IWSW, n = 9), IFNAR1 WT S1PR4-KO (IWSK, n = 10), IFNAR1 KO S1PR4 WT (IKSW, n = 5), and IFNAR1 KO S1PR4-KO (IKSK, n = 4) after 1 tumor reached a size of approximately 1.5 cm. Means ± SEM; 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (B and D), 1-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (F); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–D) WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT mice were treated with either anti–PD-1 or IgG isotype control antibodies (n = 17 each) on days 0, 6, 12, and 18 after the first tumor reached 0.6 cm in diameter. Tumors were harvested at day 27. (A) Experimental outline. (B) Relative numbers of CD8+PD-1+ and total CD8+ T cells infiltrated into PyMT tumors (n = 17) 4 weeks after treatment began. (C and D) Tumor size kinetics of treated WT (C) and S1PR4-KO (n = 16) PyMT mice (D). (E) Ifna and Ifnb mRNA expression in WT (n = 8) and S1PR4-KO (n = 9) PyMT tumors determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR). (F) Relative numbers of exhausted CD8+PD-1+ T cells in PyMT tumors of IFNAR1 WT S1PR4 WT (IWSW, n = 9), IFNAR1 WT S1PR4-KO (IWSK, n = 10), IFNAR1 KO S1PR4 WT (IKSW, n = 5), and IFNAR1 KO S1PR4-KO (IKSK, n = 4) after 1 tumor reached a size of approximately 1.5 cm. Means ± SEM; 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (B and D), 1-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction (F); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

    (A) Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of FACS-sorted WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT CD8+ T cell gene expression profiles (top 300 differentially expressed genes). (B and C) Representative gene set enrichment plots of gene sets enriched in KO PyMT CD8+ T cells. (D) Absolute cell number of splenic WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells after activation at days 0, 2, and 4. One representative experiment of 3 independent biological replicates is shown, which was repeated 5 times with similar outcomes. (E) Ki67 expression of WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells (n = 3) at day 2 determined by qPCR. (F) Relative numbers of viable WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells determined by annexin V/7-AAD staining at day 2 and day 13 for this individual experiment. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates is shown, which was repeated 3 times with similar outcomes. (G) Absolute cell number of WT and S1PR4-KO CD103+ CD8+ Trm T cells at day 13. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates, which was repeated 3 times with similar outcomes, is shown. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of FACS-sorted WT and S1PR4-KO PyMT CD8+ T cell gene expression profiles (top 300 differentially expressed genes). (B and C) Representative gene set enrichment plots of gene sets enriched in KO PyMT CD8+ T cells. (D) Absolute cell number of splenic WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells after activation at days 0, 2, and 4. One representative experiment of 3 independent biological replicates is shown, which was repeated 5 times with similar outcomes. (E) Ki67 expression of WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells (n = 3) at day 2 determined by qPCR. (F) Relative numbers of viable WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells determined by annexin V/7-AAD staining at day 2 and day 13 for this individual experiment. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates is shown, which was repeated 3 times with similar outcomes. (G) Absolute cell number of WT and S1PR4-KO CD103+ CD8+ Trm T cells at day 13. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates, which was repeated 3 times with similar outcomes, is shown. Means ± SEM; 2-tailed Student’s t test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: Expressing, Activation Assay, Staining

    (A) Venn diagram and the gene list show shared and divergent up- or downregulated genes in PyMT tumor-derived CD8+ T cells and total AOM/DSS-treated colons (day 84) comparing WT and S1PR4-KO mice. Genes selected for in vitro validation are highlighted in green. (B and C) Absolute number of WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells either untreated (w/o) or treated with (B) 0.5 μM PI3K inhibitor (Ly294002) or (C) 5 μM LTA4H inhibitor (SC 57461A) at day 2. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates is shown, which was repeated 3 times with similar outcomes. (D–I) PyMT tumor spheroids were cocultured with WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates (each containing means of 6 technical replicates) is shown. (D–F) PyMT spheroid size upon coculture with untreated (black), Ly294002-treated (green), or SC 57461A–treated (red) CD8+ T cells over 6 days (D and E) and at day 6 (F) after initial activation with representative photographs (G–I). Scale bars: 200 μm. (J) Intracellular staining of p-AKT in NTC or PIK3AP1 siRNA-treated WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells 30 minutes after activation (n = 4). p-AKT expression is shown as MFI. (K) LTB4 concentration in supernatants of WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells 1 day after activation determined by ELISA (n = 5). (L and M) Absolute number of S1PR4 agonist (Cym 50308) or antagonist (Cym 50358) pretreated CD8+ T cells either untreated (w/o) or treated with 20 μM PGP 6 days (L) or 8 days (M) after activation (n = 5). Means ± SEM; 1-way ANOVA (B–F and J) or 2-way ANOVA (L and M), each with Holm-Šidák correction; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Venn diagram and the gene list show shared and divergent up- or downregulated genes in PyMT tumor-derived CD8+ T cells and total AOM/DSS-treated colons (day 84) comparing WT and S1PR4-KO mice. Genes selected for in vitro validation are highlighted in green. (B and C) Absolute number of WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells either untreated (w/o) or treated with (B) 0.5 μM PI3K inhibitor (Ly294002) or (C) 5 μM LTA4H inhibitor (SC 57461A) at day 2. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates is shown, which was repeated 3 times with similar outcomes. (D–I) PyMT tumor spheroids were cocultured with WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells. One representative experiment with 5 independent biological replicates (each containing means of 6 technical replicates) is shown. (D–F) PyMT spheroid size upon coculture with untreated (black), Ly294002-treated (green), or SC 57461A–treated (red) CD8+ T cells over 6 days (D and E) and at day 6 (F) after initial activation with representative photographs (G–I). Scale bars: 200 μm. (J) Intracellular staining of p-AKT in NTC or PIK3AP1 siRNA-treated WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells 30 minutes after activation (n = 4). p-AKT expression is shown as MFI. (K) LTB4 concentration in supernatants of WT and S1PR4-KO CD8+ T cells 1 day after activation determined by ELISA (n = 5). (L and M) Absolute number of S1PR4 agonist (Cym 50308) or antagonist (Cym 50358) pretreated CD8+ T cells either untreated (w/o) or treated with 20 μM PGP 6 days (L) or 8 days (M) after activation (n = 5). Means ± SEM; 1-way ANOVA (B–F and J) or 2-way ANOVA (L and M), each with Holm-Šidák correction; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, In Vitro, Activation Assay, Staining, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    (A) Human PBMCs were preactivated with 10 ng/mL of LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ and prestimulated with or without 200 nM Cym 50358 (S1PR4 antagonist, n = 25) or 200 nM Cym 50308 (S1PR4 agonist, n = 15) for 30 minutes before being cocultured with MCF-7 spheroids for 6 days. The relative number of CD8+ T cells as fold of control is shown. P values were calculated using 1-sample Wilcoxon test. *P < 0.05. (B–G) The METABRIC data set (B–D) and the TCGA colon adenocarcinoma data set (E–G) were used to calculate an in silico S1P ratio, which was correlated with overall patient survival (B and E; Q1, 25% of patients with lowest S1P ratio; Q4, 25% of patients with highest S1P ratio) and CD8A or CD103 expression of human breast (C and D) and colon (F and G) tumors. (H–L) Tissue microarrays of human colon adenocarcinoma (H and I) and human invasive mammary carcinoma (J–L) cores were stained for CD3, CD8, PIK3AP1, LTA4H, and KI67 by PhenOptics. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (H) Representative images show magnified areas of colon adenocarcinoma tissue cores (full cores in Supplemental Figure 5A). Proliferating (KI67+) CD8+PIK3AP1+ T cells are marked by arrows. Scale bars: 50 μm. (I) Correlation matrix of CD8+ T cell subsets in colon adenocarcinoma tissue cores compared with proliferating tumor cells, nodal involvement, stage, and metastasis. Spearman r values are indicated. (J–L) Correlation of CD8+ T cell, PIK3AP1+CD8+ T cell, and LTA4H+CD8+ T cell infiltrates in mammary carcinoma cores with overall patient survival (Q1 indicates 25% lowest abundance; Q4 indicates 25% highest abundance each).

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via CD8 + T cell expansion

    doi: 10.1172/JCI136928

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Human PBMCs were preactivated with 10 ng/mL of LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ and prestimulated with or without 200 nM Cym 50358 (S1PR4 antagonist, n = 25) or 200 nM Cym 50308 (S1PR4 agonist, n = 15) for 30 minutes before being cocultured with MCF-7 spheroids for 6 days. The relative number of CD8+ T cells as fold of control is shown. P values were calculated using 1-sample Wilcoxon test. *P < 0.05. (B–G) The METABRIC data set (B–D) and the TCGA colon adenocarcinoma data set (E–G) were used to calculate an in silico S1P ratio, which was correlated with overall patient survival (B and E; Q1, 25% of patients with lowest S1P ratio; Q4, 25% of patients with highest S1P ratio) and CD8A or CD103 expression of human breast (C and D) and colon (F and G) tumors. (H–L) Tissue microarrays of human colon adenocarcinoma (H and I) and human invasive mammary carcinoma (J–L) cores were stained for CD3, CD8, PIK3AP1, LTA4H, and KI67 by PhenOptics. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (H) Representative images show magnified areas of colon adenocarcinoma tissue cores (full cores in Supplemental Figure 5A). Proliferating (KI67+) CD8+PIK3AP1+ T cells are marked by arrows. Scale bars: 50 μm. (I) Correlation matrix of CD8+ T cell subsets in colon adenocarcinoma tissue cores compared with proliferating tumor cells, nodal involvement, stage, and metastasis. Spearman r values are indicated. (J–L) Correlation of CD8+ T cell, PIK3AP1+CD8+ T cell, and LTA4H+CD8+ T cell infiltrates in mammary carcinoma cores with overall patient survival (Q1 indicates 25% lowest abundance; Q4 indicates 25% highest abundance each).

    Article Snippet: PBMCs were either left untreated or stimulated with 10 ng/mL LPS and 100 U/mL IFN-γ with or without addition of 200 nM S1PR4 agonist Cym 50308 or S1PR4 antagonist Cym 50358 (both from Tocris) for 30 minutes.

    Techniques: In Silico, Expressing, Staining

    Brain water content at 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the S1PR1 agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. & P<0.05 versus fingolimod. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.

    Journal: Journal of neurochemistry

    Article Title: Fingolimod Confers Neuroprotection through Activation of Rac1 after Experimental Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage in Rat Pups

    doi: 10.1111/jnc.13946

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Brain water content at 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the S1PR1 agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. & P<0.05 versus fingolimod. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.

    Article Snippet: The S1PR1, S1PR3, S1PR4 antagonist (VPC20391) and the Rac1 inhibitor (EHT1864) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Minneapolis, MN).

    Techniques:

    Spectrophotometric quantification of brain extravasated Evans blue dye (A) and hemoglobin (B) at 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the S1PR1 agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Representative images of brain sections are shown (C). Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.

    Journal: Journal of neurochemistry

    Article Title: Fingolimod Confers Neuroprotection through Activation of Rac1 after Experimental Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage in Rat Pups

    doi: 10.1111/jnc.13946

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Spectrophotometric quantification of brain extravasated Evans blue dye (A) and hemoglobin (B) at 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the S1PR1 agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Representative images of brain sections are shown (C). Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.

    Article Snippet: The S1PR1, S1PR3, S1PR4 antagonist (VPC20391) and the Rac1 inhibitor (EHT1864) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Minneapolis, MN).

    Techniques:

    Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification of GTP-Rac1/total Rac1 (B), pAkt/Akt (C), ZO1 (D), occludin (E), and claudin-3 (F) 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the S1PR1 agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. & P<0.05 versus fingolimod. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.

    Journal: Journal of neurochemistry

    Article Title: Fingolimod Confers Neuroprotection through Activation of Rac1 after Experimental Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage in Rat Pups

    doi: 10.1111/jnc.13946

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification of GTP-Rac1/total Rac1 (B), pAkt/Akt (C), ZO1 (D), occludin (E), and claudin-3 (F) 72 hours after GMH in rats treated with fingolimod (1.0 mg/kg), the S1PR1 agonist, or in rats co-administered fingolimod with a S1PR1/3/4 antagonist or a Rac1 inhibitor. Data expressed as mean ± SD. N=7 rats/group. * P<0.05 versus sham. † P<0.05 versus vehicle. & P<0.05 versus fingolimod. # P<0.05 versus S1PR1 Agonist.

    Article Snippet: The S1PR1, S1PR3, S1PR4 antagonist (VPC20391) and the Rac1 inhibitor (EHT1864) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Minneapolis, MN).

    Techniques: Western Blot